A Stochastic Frontier Approach for Performance Assessment of Indian Electricity Distribution Licensees
Abstract
Indian power sector has witnessed significant progress in recent times particularly in generation and transmission. However, the distribution licensees today are facing different challenges in terms of huge financial losses caused by several factors including inadequate tariff, high aggregate technical and commercial losses, operational inefficiencies, regulatory infirmities etc. Thus, there is a need to effectively assess the efficiency and overall performance of distribution utilities and provide solution for improvement. The present study analyses the performance of 59 Indian electricity distribution licensees (including both public and private owned) by working out the technical efficiency using the mathematical model of Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA). In the present research, the authors estimated a translogarithmic inefficiency effects stochastic frontier model using consumer density, consumer structure and distribution loss as determinants of inefficiency. The quantitative estimates obtained from the production function shows the mean technical efficiency score of 0.81 indicating that on the average, the electricity distribution licensees were able to obtain about 81% of potential output from a given mix of inputs and there was 19% allowance for improving efficiency of electricity distribution utilities. This framework would be practical for policy makers and individual state electricity regulatory commission to rank their distribution licensees and formulate performance based incentive mechanism to improve their operational and financial performance.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Thakur T, Deshmukh SG, Kaushik SC et al. Impact assessment of the Electricity Act 2003 on the Indian Power Sector. Energy Policy 2005; 33: 1187-98.
Thakur T, Deshmukh SG, Kaushik SC. Efficiency evaluation of the state-owned electric utilities in India. Energy Policy 2006; 34: 2788-804.
Farell MJ. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 1957; 120: 253-81.
Aigner DJ, Chu SF. On estimating the industry production function. American Economic Review 1968; 58: 826-39.
Schimdt PJ, Lovell CAK. Estimating technical and allocative inefficiency relative to stochastic production and cost functions. Journal of Econometrics 1979; 9: 343-66.
Coelli T, Rao DSP, Battese GE. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1998.
Aigner DJ, Lovell CAK, Schmidt PJ. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics 1977; 6: 21-37.
Meeusen W, Van Den Broeck J. Efficiency estimation from Cobb’s Douglas production function with composed error. International Economic Review 1977; 18: 435-44.
Battese GE, Coelli TJ. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function. Empirical Economics 1995; 20: 325-32.
Coelli TJ. A guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation. CEPA Working papers, No. 7/96, School of Economics, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia, 1996.
Battese GE, Corra GS. Estimation of a production frontier model: with application to the pastoral zone of Eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 1977; 21: 169-79.
Kumbhakar SC, Lovell CAK. Stochastic Frontier Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, UK, 2000.
Jamasb T, Pollitt M. Benchmarking and regulation: international electricity experience. Utilities Policy 2001; 9: 107-30.
Jamasb T, Pollitt M. International benchmarking and yardstick regulation: an application to European electricity distribution utilities. Energy Policy 2003; 31: 1609-22.
Atkinson SE, Cornwell C. Parametric estimation of technical and allocative inefficiency with panel data. International Economic Review 1994; 35: 231-43.
Battese GE, Coelli TJ. A Stochastic frontier production function incorporating a model for technical inefficiency effects. Working paper No.69, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, 1993.
Kodde DA, Palm FC. Wald Criteria for Jointly Testing Equality and Inequality Restrictions. Econometrica 1986; 54: 1243-48.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.